After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures across Europe, fresh technologies are now reviving these types of systems. Coming from lie diagnosis tools analyzed at the border to a program for validating documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of solutions is being included in asylum applications. This article is exploring just how these technology have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. It reveals how asylum seekers are transformed into obligated hindered techno-users: They are asked to adhere to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps also to keep up with unstable tiny within criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs their capacity to find their way these devices and to follow their right for proper protection.
It also shows how these technologies will be embedded in refugee governance: They assist in the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of distributed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by simply hindering them from getting at the programs of coverage. It www.ascella-llc.com/what-is-the-due-diligence-data-room/ further states that examines of securitization and victimization should be put together with an insight in the disciplinary mechanisms of these technologies, through which migrants will be turned into data-generating subjects just who are self-disciplined by their reliability on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal know-how, the article states that these technologies have an natural obstructiveness. There is a double effect: when they assistance to expedite the asylum process, they also make it difficult pertaining to refugees to navigate these types of systems. They are really positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes these people vulnerable to illegitimate decisions of non-governmental celebrities, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their instances. Moreover, that they pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in inaccurate or discriminatory outcomes.